Page 151 - Amechanon_vol1_2016-18
P. 151

Amechanon, Vol. I / 2016-2018, ISSN: 2459-2846



                   consciousness of victimhood and suffering by the children and they, of course, serve as
                   part of processing grief as well as creating meaning. In the Community of Inquiry, the

                   possibility to implement an analysis of the human experience and a manner for accepting
                   its meaning are clarified. Man’s basic aspiration to create narrative coherency or to oppose

                   it in his familial setting is expressed here. During the philosophical inquiry, many signs of
                                         212
                   philosophical  sensitivity   have  been  revealed  regarding  the  pressures  exerted  on  the
                   children or the non-acceptance of their deeds.

                   Through philosophical inquiry, a completely involuntary act of clarification was carried out

                   of the narrative working upon memory. Covarero has said that every human being, even
                   without wanting to know it, is aware that he is a narratable self and he is submerged in the

                                                         213
                   spontaneity of memory’s individual story . That being the case, the narrative is home for
                   the subject, for the other and for the distinctiveness that he has thus created for the group.

                   «The narratable self» finds its home not only in a conscious practice of remembering, but
                   in a spontaneous narrated structure of memory itself. For this reason, there are those who

                                                               214
                   define the self as «narratable and not narrated» .

                   The children who participated in the Community of Inquiry were accordingly in a narrative-
                   philosophical  situation  which  presupposes  a  world  view  and  subjective  interpretation.

                   These are not unequivocal and they fundamentally stem from a flight from pretension to

                   firm  arguments  for  objectivism.  On  the  level  of  understanding,  a  person  understands
                   himself through the narrative. On the level of concern, the young person, the «self», seeks
                   to  realize  his  identity  and  his  fundamental  truth  and  that  of  his  group  as  part  of  his

                   certainty. Thus, the «self» exists in uncertainty and ponders whether it has internalized

                   something  external  in  the  correct  manner  which  then  has  become  a  solid  part  of  its
                   identity. Therefore, it reverberates as narrative, or it is given to an external manipulation

                   that internalizes, determines, and establishes a truth – despite its group’s narrated, often
                   imaginary, events of the past – which contains patently incorrect elements which the «self»

                   cannot filter and regulate as part of the construction of identity.




                   212  Lone, J.,M., Teaching pre-college philosophy: The cultivation of philosophical sensitivity, op.cit.

                   213
                      Covarero, A., Relating Narratives: Storytelling and the Selfhood, London & New York: Routledge,
                   2000.

                   214  Ibid., p. 34.



                                                           151
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156