Page 490 - Amechanon_vol1_2016-18
P. 490

Amechanon, Vol. I / 2016-2018, ISSN: 2459-2846



                   Τhey  are  linked  in  the  practice  and  in  a  way  the  improviser  is  in  the  moment  but  the

                   improviser is also in a way not so fall in love of his experience. So he is disposed to change.
                   He  can  say,  «I  had  a  nice  workshop…OK…it  is  not  important  comparing  to  another
                   workshop»… You know? … Is just an experience of feeling with improvisation and an

                   opportunity to share the feeling and is not sound that it could be repeated. What could be

                   repeated is the disposition to improvise and also some technique in order to do it, for
                   instance: Use your body. You cannot stay there and speak about improvisation. You feel

                   that you have to move. You feel that you have to show your love with the moment. But
                   this is not a drama.


                   It's the way it should be expressed. Not like drama. You do that for the sake of it.


                   So  in  a  way  technique  is  in  its  original  meaning,  a  procedure,  an  gathering  of  tools.
                   Wittgenstein called it the toolkit. It is the toolkit you have in order to be not completely
                   disarmed.


                   All right, I guess you were speaking mostly for the teacher as a trainer who need that. So
                   it is important, actually it's necessary for the teacher to have that. How do you transfer it

                   or how do you transfer to children to think in that way, to improvise. Or you think is it a
                   name for also children to improvise and allow children to improvise in the classroom and

                   thinking that way?

                   In a sense we are obliged to provoke improvisation with children. So you cannot improvise

                   if you don't allow improvisation.

                   I mean, it can come also from the children not only from the teacher.

                   Yes, of course. I think that what could be interesting is to create an improvisational culture
                   and that is what we need. Completely. Also improvisation is not considerate the good thing

                   in teacher methodologies, you know. You have a name, a weight... is not important that

                   you are a good improviser and nobody have in mind this kind of disposition. It’s not the
                   main point of the school program to create a good improviser. So in a sense we need to
                   propose a new improvisational culture and this is possible only if you abandon the ideology

                   of product, the ideology of result, the ideology of exit profile. So you cannot know in

                   advance what could be the profile of student … but the university and the community ask:
                   I have to know what should be the end of the process, which is the aim. And so, in this way,




                                                           490
   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495